haciendadelalamogolfresort.co.uk
So, The Players Championship. Big win for Cameron Young. Nice. But honestly, that’s almost a footnote. The real story? The PGA Tour just laid out a plan that could change golf forever. Like, *forever*. Forget the scores for a minute. Let’s talk about where this sport is actually heading. Because it’s a wild ride, and most folks are just watching the ball.
Cameron Young, yeah, he pulled it off. Shot a 68. Beat Matt Fitzpatrick by one. Ludvig Aberg? Led for 54 holes and then… well, he shot a 76. Faded hard on the back nine. So, did Young win it, or did Aberg lose it? The answer, as usual, is a resounding “both, you idiot.” It felt like a dozen guys were gifting it away at different points. Aberg was chief among them, sure. But Young? He went and took it. Those last two holes, 17 and 18? Championship stuff. Absolute class.
Josh Schrock, one of our guys, put it best: Young had to play damn good golf on a brutal, windy course with trouble lurking everywhere just to be in the hunt. And even then, he needed Ludvig to completely let go of the wheel. If Ludvig just played even par on Sunday, Young would’ve had to do exactly what he did just to force a playoff. Ludvig opened the door, and Young walked through, slammed it shut with those final two holes. That’s how you win. That’s how you earn it.
Josh Berhow, our editor, chimed in too. It’s both. Aberg had his chance. But shooting a 76 from the final pairing on a Sunday? That’s letting it slip through your fingers. Plain and simple. But it works both ways, right? Look at 17. Fitzpatrick plays it safe, middle of the green, one-shot lead. Young? He attacked the pin. Stuck it to ten feet. Birdie. Then he wins it on 18 with arguably the best drive of the day. That’s not just winning; that’s going out there and *demanding* it.
For a while there, Cameron Young was the guy. The one who was *supposed* to win. The tough-luck loser. The one who hadn’t quite broken through on the big stage. Now? Two wins. A Players Championship title. What the hell changed? It’s not just one thing, obviously. But there are some major shifts.
Dylan Dethier, another one of our writers, thinks Young found some winning mojo. A bigger-picture thing. But there’s a more specific answer too. His putting. Seriously. He’s openly credited a caddie switch with changing his perspective on the greens. Hooked up with his college teammate, Kyle Sterbinsky, last May. And bam. They found something. He’s been on an upward trajectory ever since. You love to see it. When a guy finally clicks, it’s good for the sport.
Schrock agrees. Young went from being a guy who routinely missed short putts to one of the better putters on Tour. That’s the key. Plus, finally getting that first win at the Wyndham Championship, and then backing it up by being the best damn player on the Ryder Cup team? That’s gotta give you some serious confidence. It’s the snowball effect. Little wins lead to big wins. No surprise there.
Berhow sees it as a mix of everything. Putting is huge, no doubt. But these guys? They’ve got this superpower: they think their best can beat *anyone*. You need that to be elite. And after Wyndham, it had to feel like that monkey was off his back. That led to a massive Ryder Cup week. And now, this second win. Those little victories? They build into massive momentum. Fast.
Okay, now for the real meat. The PGA Tour’s new CEO, Brian Rolapp, dropped his six pillars for the Tour’s future. And it’s a doozy. A two-track system. Splashier events. Bigger markets. Promotion and relegation. Match play potential. More. It’s a lot to digest. What are the initial thoughts? And what’s the most interesting bit?
Dylan’s initial take? They sound good. But watching Sunday at TPC Sawgrass, with all the talk of bigger markets, he was reflecting on something. For all the focus on hitting the biggest cities, there’s still a lot to be said for leaning into the greatness of a mid-sized city. Jacksonville isn’t exactly New York City, but The Players is *the* event there. Being outside the biggest markets can help sell corporate hospitality, sure. But there’s a balance. A happy medium.
Schrock’s biggest takeaway? Rolapp is finally listening. He’s leaning into what fans and media have been screaming for. 120-man fields with cuts? Hell yes. The Tour should absolutely lean into that cutline drama, especially with this new two-track system. Promotion and relegation? Sign him up. He’s got questions, though. About the two tracks, the money, how it all shakes out. He likes the idea of big markets, but doesn’t want to see the Tour abandon historically important, smaller cities. On paper, it sounds great. But he’s waiting for the next update before he gets too excited.
Berhow thinks it’s a big step forward overall. He loves the idea of match play potentially in the playoffs. Constantly switching formats every few years isn’t the answer. His lingering question? The two-track system alongside the Korn Ferry Tour. We want to condense the schedule, make events mean more. But two leagues *above* the Korn Ferry? That’s still a lot of golf. His point is, you need to *miss* golf sometimes for people to truly fall in love with it. He’s skeptical this will achieve that. But he’ll wait to learn more before he loses sleep.
So, if you’re a Tour member, what’s to love? What’s to hate?
For the average Tour player, Dylan thinks they’ll generally be in favor. The fact that the Tour is sticking with 120-player fields, not chasing further reductions like some of these newer Signature Events (which feel damn empty with only 70-something guys), is a welcome compromise. But there will be resistance. Players who are skeptical about fewer tournaments leading to greater attention. Players who feel like there are fewer seats at the big table. But the Tour is leaning into meritocracy. That’s a good thing for whoever is playing the best.
Schrock believes Rolapp has done a decent job of appeasing everyone. As Dylan said, some guys won’t be thrilled about fewer tournaments. But expanding to 120-man fields? That’s a huge win for the Tour’s “middle class.” If this second track, or whatever they call it, gets purses similar to current standard PGA Tour events ($8-10 million), then most people should be happy.
Berhow figures the elite guys will play a little less and make more money. They’ll like that. The guys who might not be thrilled? Probably those hovering around the top 100 who might find themselves on the second track. That could be a hit to the ego. And the bank account. But hey, guaranteed playing privileges? Who knows.
Okay, Average Joe Fan at home, you’re probably wondering what all this means for you. Here’s the lowdown.
Dylan’s optimistic take? It means you’ll finally get some clarity. You’ll know which tournaments are the *real* top-tier PGA Tour events and which ones aren’t. He’s hopeful this is the PGA Tour schedule finally coming together in its final form. For now. Maybe. We’ll see.
Schrock’s view? We’re heading towards a schedule that gives you a solid group of events with all the big names. Bigger stakes than the current Tour offers. You’ll also get some extra golf on the second track if that’s your thing. But can Rolapp actually pull it off? It always looks good on PowerPoint. Execution is a whole different ballgame, especially with so many stakeholders involved.
Berhow’s take? There’s still plenty of golf on TV every weekend. But will one tour be demonstrably better than the other? That remains to be seen. It’s a fascinating time to be a golf fan, that’s for sure. Lots of moving parts.
With the Masters just a month away, there were a couple of other noteworthy weekend results. Scottie Scheffler’s up-and-down T22 finish at TPC Sawgrass, looking a bit off his game. Or Bryson DeChambeau winning over at LIV Golf Singapore. Which is the bigger story?
Dylan thinks Scottie is the bigger deal. We kind of expected DeChambeau to be in good form heading into major season anyway. Scheffler? It seems likely he will be too. But he’s got a few things to iron out between now and then. Watching Scheffler pounding balls in the rain after Thursday’s round was one of those enduring images from the week. It’ll be fun watching him figure it out.
Schrock says it’s Scottie, no question. There’s clearly something going on between the driver and his approach play that’s dipped. It’s officially a concern with only a month to go. His only note on LIV Singapore? Those sun sleeves have got to go. Seriously.
Berhow’s going with both. Scottie hasn’t been playing to his usual sky-high standards lately. But here’s the crazy part. For as “off” as he’s seemed, his finishes this year are: T22, T12, T4, T3, 1. That version of Scottie is still really, really good. As soon as he gets his driver sorted, he’ll be back to the guy we know. He’s got some time off now to work on it. As for Bryson? It’s not nothing! DeChambeau playing well before the Masters is good for the sport. And he’s finished top six in his last two Masters starts. Bryson contending at Augusta? That would be a lot of fun.
So, what’s the ultimate takeaway from this Players Championship?
Dylan’s is that the PGA Tour has been searching for its third star – you know, besides Scottie and Rory. He’s not saying Cam Young is *there* yet, but he’s definitely entering the conversation. Also, he adds: Let The Players be! It’s not a major. It’s its own thing. And that thing is big, fun, important, and chaotic. He enjoyed this edition.
Schrock predicts Ludvig Aberg will win a major this year and become that third star Dylan mentioned by year’s end. He played brilliantly for two days, was smooth on Saturday, and then things got away from him on a course where carnage is all around. That’s happened to countless guys at Sawgrass. Ludvig clearly found something at Pebble, and Schrock thinks he’ll knock off a few big events this summer. Honorable mention to Brooks Koepka, who is trending and was just a couple of scruffy holes away from being in the mix on Sunday.
Berhow’s takeaway? Watching Ludvig struggle on the back nine on Sunday actually made him like him *more* for the Masters. Sometimes, it’s good to get that stuff out of the way, learn from it, and move on. And he agrees with Dylan. We can have four majors and still have The Players Championship, which is a damn good tournament! Few things are more exhausting than this major/non-major debate, but of course, we’ll just have it again next year. It’s golf. What did you expect?
If you’re looking for the latest in golf equipment, check out Golf Distillery’s gear section for insights and reviews.